Thursday, August 14, 2008

Grousing about grousing

I read this really disturbing article last week, and it's kind of been on my mind for awhile. It concerns internet trolling, which means intentionally pushing peoples' buttons to get them riled up, just for fun. We've all seen this behavior. It's the sort of thing that would get you punched in the face in a real-world setting, but it has been accepted as inevitable in the setting of the world wild web. The article discusses some of the more extreme incidences of trolling, where people's lives are affected by the meanness of anonymous strangers.

Denizens of my favorite online forum, the Chit Chatters on Boardgamegeek, often proclaim "Sheesh. It's the internet. Don't take things so seriously!", implying that it's the fault of the offended party for being so uncool as to be offended. Apparently, the biggest social faux pas in the virtual world is to bear the belief that the person you're interacting with, somewhere out there, actually represents an entity with convictions.

In the same vein, one of the trolls in the article tells the interviewer, "You have green hair.". The interviewer is puzzled, but amused, and denies this. The troll says, "That must be why you're a terrible reporter". The reporter responds, "Why do you think that?". The troll then triumphantly points out that if the reporter was truly confident in his skills, he would have laughed off the second comment as quickly as the first. He says that he uses this concept to "educate" people on how to properly respond to things that they read on the internet. On his internet.

When I first read that, I thought that I got what he was saying, but on reflection I realize that I really don't. If I tell you something that is a concrete fact that you know to be untrue, and that you know that I know to be untrue, and vice versa ad infinitum (just to be safe), then of course you'd laugh it off. If I followed that with a critical assessment of your worth as a parent (assuming you have kids), you may want to know why I came to that conclusion. Presumably, I've met your kid and seen you interacting with him or her, so I have reason to have an independent opinion. These are normal reactions to these types of statements. Normal reactions shouldn't have to change because of the medium.

It's really too bad. We have this great medium for getting together publicly and anonymously, and an handful of pricks decide that it must serve their vulgarity first. Like sheep, we comply.

3 comments:

  1. My word, you spend too much time reading BGG! :D

    I read the same article; My take on "not taking things so seriously" on the internet is because most of the people trolling are insecure pimply 13 year olds. The people interviewed are no different. (Just older, and they managed to find the Clerasil at Target.) So who gives a fuck what they say? It's not necessarily about having thick skin v. thin skin, it's more about realizing that the message is coming from a douchebag with nothing more interesting to do — a lameass.

    This also reminds me of a Dilbert series from a few years ago. Dilbert makes some ridiculous comment about Wally over email, and Wally peeks over the cube wall and says "You're mighty brave in cyberspace, flameboy." Dilbert gestures at his computer and says "Step inside." (Fugitive from the Cubicle Police p221)

    And you're ugly.
    :D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Drinkin' and Bloggin' can often lead to some bashful morning reading. Oh, well, it's up and I can't change it.

    Wait, yes I can.

    I trimmed the fat a bit, since the BGG anecdotes were not really adding anything. I mostly get frustrated there because it's NOT mostly 13 year-olds, but this attitude somehow prevails. It can end an interesting discussion instantly. Once you've invested energy trying to argue your side, is it so hard to say, "I can see how that might have bothered some people. Sorry about that...back to the discussion", instead of "You're all a bunch of pansy-asses who have no sense of humor"?

    And your mama didn't mind me being so ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh, and I found the article disturbing because of the apparent power and ill-will that is wielded by these sociopaths. It's one thing to "publicly" embarrass someone, and quite another to steal directly from their bank account or play with their ID, all because they crossed the wrong person's path.

    ReplyDelete

Rules for commenting

Comments have been disabled until I decide to start this old biddy up again. Tired of notifications of spam comments. "Hey, just in case you randomly want to get ahold of some sleeping pills, click on this totally non-sketchy link in my comment on an unrelated blog post. Trust me!"

1)Use your head. Only the most clever abuse will remain undeleted.
2)Anonymity is frowned upon with the sternest of frownings.
3)No comments suggesting that I sell my daughter. Comments already existing are grandfathered.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.